Velocity-model building is a key step in hydrocarbon exploration. The main product of velocity-model building is an initial model of the subsurface that is subsequently used in seismic imaging and interpretation workflows. Reflection or refraction tomography and full-waveform inversion (FWI) are the most commonly used techniques in velocity-model building. On one hand, tomography is a time-consuming activity that relies on successive updates of highly human-curated analysis of gathers. On the other hand, FWI is very computationally demanding with no guarantees of global convergence. We propose and implement a novel concept that bypasses these demanding steps, directly producing an accurate gridding or layered velocity model from shot gathers. Our approach relies on training deep neural networks. The resulting predictive model maps relationships between the data space and the final output (particularly the presence of high-velocity segments that might indicate salt formations). The training task takes a few hours for 2D data, but the inference step (predicting a model from previously unseen data) takes only seconds. The promising results shown here for synthetic 2D data demonstrate a new way of using seismic data and suggest fast turnaround of workflows that now make use of machine-learning approaches to identify key structures in the subsurface.

References

Addison, V., 2016, Artificial intelligence takes shape in oil and gas sector: EPmag, https://www.epmag.com/artificial-intelligence-takes-shape-oil-gas-sector-846041, accessed 5 December 2017.Crossref Google Scholar
Adler, A., D. Boublil, and M. Zibulevsky, 2017, Block-based compressed sensing of images via deep learning: Presented at the 19th IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing.Crossref Google Scholar
Araya-Polo, M., T. Dahlke, C. Frogner, C. Zhang, T. Poggio, and D. Hohl, 2017, Automated fault detection without seismic processing: The Leading Edge, 36, no. 3, 208–214, https://doi.org/10.1190/tle36030208.1.Abstract Google Scholar
Biondi, B., 2006, 3D seismic imaging: SEG, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801689.Abstract Google Scholar
BizTech, 2014, High performance computing's role in energy exploration, https://biztechmagazine.com/article/2014/07/hpc%E2%80%99s-role-energy-exploration, accessed 5 December 2017.Google Scholar
Bougher, B., and F. Herrmann, 2016, AVA classification as an unsupervised machine-learning problem: 86th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 553–556, https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2016-13874419.1.Abstract Google Scholar
Burger, H. C., C. J. Schuler, and S. Harmeling, 2012, Image denoising: Can plain neural networks compete with BM3D?: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247952.Crossref Google Scholar
Dahlke, T., M. Araya-Polo, C. Zhang, and C. Frogner, 2016, Predicting geological features in 3D seismic data: Presented at 3D Deep Learning Workshop.Crossref Google Scholar
Dong, C., C. C. Loy, K. He, and X. Tang, 2016, Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 38, no. 2, 295–307, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2439281.Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar
Frogner, C., C. Zhang, H. Mobahi, M. Araya-Polo, and T. A. Poggio, 2015, Learning with a Wasserstein loss, in C. Cortes, D. D. Lee, M. Sugiyama, and R. Garnett, eds., Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems — Volume 2: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goodfellow, I., Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, 2016, Deep learning: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guillen, P., 2015, Supervised learning to detect salt body: 85th Annual International Meeting, SEG, 1826–1829, https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2015-5931401.1.Abstract Google Scholar
Hale, D., 2013, Methods to compute fault images, extract fault surfaces, and estimate fault throws from 3d seismic images: Geophysics, 78, no. 2, O33–O43, https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0331.1.Abstract Web of Science Google Scholar
Hale, D., 2012, Fault surfaces and fault throws from 3d seismic images: 82nd Annual International Meeting, SEG, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012-0734.1.Abstract Google Scholar
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, 2001, The elements of statistical learning: Springer New York Inc.Crossref Google Scholar
Hornik, K., M. Stinchcombe, and H. White, 1989, Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators: Neural Networks, 2, no. 5, 359–366, https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8.Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar
LeCun, Y., Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, 2015, Deep learning: Nature, 521, no. 7553, 436–444, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539.Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar
Luo, S., and D. Hale, 2012, Velocity analysis using weighted semblance: Geophysics, 77, no. 2, U15–U22, https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2011-0034.1.Abstract Web of Science Google Scholar
Nath, S. K., S. Chakroborty, S. K. Singh, and N. Ganguly, 1999, Velocity inversion in cross-hole seismic tomography by counter-propagation neural network, genetic algorithm and evolutionary programming techniques: Geophysical Journal International, 138, no. 1, 108–124, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00835.x.Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar
Röth, G., and A. Tarantola, 1994, Neural networks and inversion of seismic data: Journal of Geophysical Research, 99, no. B4, 6753–6768, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JB01563.Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar
Szeliski, R., 2010, Computer vision: Algorithms and applications: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
van der Baan, M., and C. Jutten, 2000, Neural networks in geophysical applications: Geophysics, 65, no. 4, 1032–1047, https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444797.Abstract Web of Science Google Scholar
Wang, Z., A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli, 2004, Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity: IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13, no. 4, 600–612, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861.Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar
Wang, G., 2016, A perspective on deep imaging: IEEE Access, 4, 8914–8924, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2624938.Crossref Web of Science Google Scholar
Würfl, T., F. C. Ghesu, V. Christlein, and A. Maier, 2016, Deep learning computed tomography: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 432–440, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46726-9_50.Crossref Google Scholar
Xie, J., L. Xu, and E. Chen, 2012, Image denoising and inpainting with deep neural networks: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems — Volume 1, 341–349.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Ö., 2001, Seismic data analysis: SEG.Abstract Google Scholar
Zhang, C., C. Frogner, M. Araya-Polo, and D. Hohl, 2014, Machine-learning based automated fault detection in seismic traces: 76th Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20141500.Crossref Google Scholar