ABSTRACT
We have applied an attribute-based autopicking algorithm to reflection seismics with the aim of reducing the influence of the user’s subjectivity on the picking results and making the interpretation faster with respect to manual and semiautomated techniques. Our picking procedure uses the cosine of the instantaneous phase to automatically detect and mark as a horizon any recorded event characterized by lateral phase continuity. A patching procedure, which exploits horizon parallelism, can be used to connect consecutive horizons marking the same event but separated by noise-related gaps. The picking process marks all coherent events regardless of their reflection strength; therefore, a large number of independent horizons can be constructed. To facilitate interpretation, horizons marking different phases of the same reflection can be automatically grouped together and specific horizons from each reflection can be selected using different possible methods. In the phase method, the algorithm reconstructs the reflected wavelets by averaging the cosine of the instantaneous phase along each horizon. The resulting wavelets are then locally analyzed and confronted through crosscorrelation, allowing the recognition and selection of specific reflection phases. In case the reflected wavelets cannot be recovered due to shape-altering processing or a low signal-to-noise ratio, the energy method uses the reflection strength to group together subparallel horizons within the same energy package and to select those satisfying either energy or arrival time criteria. These methods can be applied automatically to all the picked horizons or to horizons individually selected by the interpreter for specific analysis. We show examples of application to 2D reflection seismic data sets in complex geologic and stratigraphic conditions, critically reviewing the performance of the whole process.
REFERENCES
- , 1982, Automatic phase-pickers: Their present use and future prospects: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 72,
S225–S242 .BSSAAP 0037-1106 - , 1987, An automatic phase picker for local and teleseismic events: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 77,
1437–1445 .BSSAAP 0037-1106 - , 2005, Seismic attributes — A historical perspective: Geophysics, 70, no. 5,
3SO–28SO , doi:10.1190/1.2098670 .GPYSA7 0016-8033 - , 1998, Modern 3-D seismic interpretation: The Leading Edge, 17,
1262–1272 , doi:10.1190/1.1438121 . - , 2015a, Automated reflection picking and polarity assessment through attribute analysis: Theory and application to synthetic and real GPR data: Geophysics, 80, no. 5,
H23–H35 , doi:10.1190/geo2015-0098.1 .GPYSA7 0016-8033 - , 2015b, Auto-picking and phase assessment by means of attribute analysis applied to GPR pavement inspection:
Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR) , IEEE,1–4 . - , 2014, The Messinian Salinity Crisis: New seismic evidence in the West-Sardinian Margin and Eastern Sardo-Provençal basin (West Mediterranean Sea): Marine Geology, 351,
76–90 , doi:10.1016/j.margeo.2014.03.019 .MAGEA6 0025-3227 - , 2014, Pitfalls in horizon autopicking: Interpretation, 3, no. 1,
SB1–SB4 , doi:10.1190/INT-2014-0062.1 . - , 2011, A review of “global” interpretation methods for automated 3D horizon picking: The Leading Edge, 30,
38–47 , doi:10.1190/1.3535431 . - , 2007, Volumetric flattening: An interpretation tool: The Leading Edge, 26,
888–897 , doi:10.1190/1.2756869 . - , 2009, A global interpretation based on cost function minimization:
79th Annual International Meeting, SEG , Expanded Abstracts,2592–2596 . - , 2010, Automatic first-breaks picking: New strategies and algorithms: Geophysics, 75, no. 4,
V67–V76 , doi:10.1190/1.3463703 .GPYSA7 0016-8033 - , 2004, Relative geologic time (age) volumes — Relating every seismic sample to a geologically reasonable horizon: The Leading Edge, 23,
928–932 , doi:10.1190/1.1803505 . - , 1979, Complex seismic trace analysis: Geophysics, 44,
1041–1063 , doi:10.1190/1.1440994 .GPYSA7 0016-8033
