This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can disable cookies at any time.


Cased petroleum wells must be logged to determine the bonding and hydraulic isolation properties of the sealing material and to determine the structural integrity status. Although ultrasonic pitch-catch logging in single-casing geometries has been widely studied and is commercially available, this is not the case for logging in double-casing geometries despite its increasing importance in plug and abandonment operations. It is therefore important to investigate whether existing logging tools can be used in such geometries. Using a finite-element model of a double-casing geometry with a two-receiver pitch-catch setup, we have simulated through-tubing logging, with fluid between the two casings. We found that there appears a cascade of leaky Lamb wave packets on both casings, linked by leaked wavefronts. By varying the geometry and materials in the model, we have examined the effect on the pulse received from the second wave packet on the inner casing, sometimes known as the third interface echo. The amplitude of this pulse was found to contain information on the bonded material in the outer annulus. Much stronger amplitude variations were found with two equally thick casings than with a significant thickness difference; relative thickness differences of up to one-third were simulated. Finally, we have developed a simple mathematical model of the wave packets’ time evolution to encapsulate and validate our understanding of the wave packet cascade. This model shows a more complex time evolution in the later wave packets than the exponentially attenuated primary packet, which is currently used for single-casing logging. This indicates that tools with more than two receivers, which could measure wave packets’ amplitude at more than two points along their time evolution, would be able to draw more information from these later packets. The model was validated against simulations, finding good agreement when the underlying assumptions of the model were satisfied.


  • Arbuzov, A. A., 2012, Memory magnetic imaging defectoscopy: Presented at the SPE Russian Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Technical Conference, 10.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bellabarba, M., H. Bulte-loyer, B. Froelich, S. Le Roy-Delage, R. van Kuijk, S. Zeroug, D. Guillot, N. Moroni, S. Pastor, and A. Zanchi, 2008, Ensuring zonal isolation beyond the life of the well: Oilfield Review, 20, 18–31.OIREE70923-1730Google Scholar
  • Brill, T. M., C. Demichel, E. A. Nichols, and F. Z. Bermudez, 2011, Electromagnetic casing inspection tool for corrosion evaluation: Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, 14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Castagna, J. P., M. L. Batzle, and R. L. Eastwood, 1985, Relationships between compressional-wave in elastic silicate rocks and shear-wave velocities: Geophysics, 50, 571–581, doi: 10.1190/1.1441933.GPYSA70016-8033AbstractWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • COMSOL, 2015a, Acoustics module user’s guide: COMSOL.Google Scholar
  • COMSOL, 2015b, Structural mechanics module user’s guide: COMSOL.Google Scholar
  • Donovan, G., P. Fadesere, G. Ware, L. Daigle, F. Suparman, G. Frisch, P. Fox, M. Englar, G. Moake, and W. Guo, 2015, Behind pipe log evaluation study: Deepwater subsea abandonments in the Gulf of Mexico: Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 23.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Haldorsen, J., D. Johnson, T. Plona, B. Sinha, H.-P. Valero, and K. Winkler, 2006, Borehole acoustic waves: Oilfield Review, 18, no. 1, 34–43.OIREE70923-1730Google Scholar
  • Hayman, A., R. Hutin, and P. Wright, 1991, High-resolution cementation and corrosion imaging by ultrasound: Presented at the SPWLA 32nd Annual Logging Symposium.Google Scholar
  • He, X., H. Chen, and X. Wang, 2014, Ultrasonic leaky flexural waves in multilayered media: Cement bond detection for cased wellbores: Geophysics, 79, no. 2, A7–A11, doi: 10.1190/geo2013-0361.1.GPYSA70016-8033AbstractWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Hora, P., and O. Cervená, 2012, Determination of Lamb wave dispersion curves by means of Fourier transform: Applied and Computational Mechanics, 6, 5–16.Google Scholar
  • Lagarias, J. C., J. A. Reeds, M. H. Wright, and P. E. Wright, 1998, Convergence properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions: SIAM Journal of Optimization, 9, 112–147, doi: 10.1137/S1052623496303470.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • McKenna, J., M. McKenna, S. Yushanov, J. Crompton, and K. Koppenhoefer, 2008, Computational modeling of wave propagation in a geophysical domain: Presented at the COMSOL Conference.Google Scholar
  • NORSOK D-010, 2013, Well integrity in drilling and well operations (4th ed.): Standards Norway.Google Scholar
  • Tian, J., Q. Wang, Q. Guo, H. Guo, and C. Liu, 2011, Casing integrity evaluation in deep well with extreme heavy mud in Tarim Basin: Proceedings of the SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, SPE 140982, 1–8.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • van Kuijk, R., J.-L. le Calvez, and B. Froelich, 2006, Determination of the impedance of a material behind a casing combining two sets of ultrasonic measurements: U.S. Patent 7,149,146 B2.Google Scholar
  • van Kuijk, R., S. Zeroug, B. Froelich, M. Allouche, S. Bose, D. Miller, J.-L. le Calvez, V. Schoepf, and A. Pagnin, 2005, A novel ultrasonic cased-hole imager for enhanced cement evaluation: Presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang, H., G. Tao, X. Shang, and C. Xiao, 2014, Review of acoustic logging on cement bond and studies on acoustic/ultrasonic methods for low-density cement bond logging: Well Logging Technology, 38, 165–173.Google Scholar
  • Wright, P., 1993, Method and apparatus for the acoustic investigation of a casing cemented in a borehole: U.S. Patent 5,216,638.Google Scholar
  • Zeroug, S., 1998, Spectral integral formulae for the response of acoustic transducers in cylindrically curved configurations: IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 45, 768–778, doi: 10.1109/58.677727.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Zeroug, S., 2000, Analytical modeling for fast simulations of ultrasonic measurements on fluid-loaded layered elastic structures: IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 47, 565–574, doi: 10.1109/58.842043.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Zeroug, S., 2002, Method and apparatus for ultrasonic imaging of a cased well: U.S. Patent 6,483,777 B1.Google Scholar
  • Zeroug, S., and B. Froelich, 2003, Ultrasonic leaky-Lamb wave imaging through a highly contrasting layer: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, 794–798.Google Scholar