This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can disable cookies at any time.

×
Advanced search
Skip main navigation

Previous
Next
No AccessGEOPHYSICSVolume 81, Issue 1

Identifying hydrologic flowpaths on arctic hillslopes using electrical resistivity and self potential

Authors:
https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0172.1

ABSTRACT

Shallow subsurface flow is a dominant process controlling hillslope runoff generation, soil development, and solute reaction and transport. Despite their importance, the location and geometry of these flow paths are difficult to determine. In arctic environments, shallow subsurface flow paths are limited to a thin zone of seasonal thaw above permafrost, which is traditionally assumed to mimic the surface topography. We have used a combined approach of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and self-potential (SP) measurements to map shallow subsurface flow paths in and around water tracks, drainage features common to arctic hillslopes. ERT measurements delineate thawed zones in the subsurface that control flow paths, whereas SP is sensitive to groundwater flow. We have found that areas of low electrical resistivity in the water tracks were deeper than manual thaw depth estimates and varied from the surface topography. This finding suggests that traditional techniques might underestimate active-layer thaw and the extent of the flow path network on arctic hillslopes. SP measurements identify complex 3D flow paths in the thawed zone. Our results lay the groundwork for investigations into the seasonal dynamics, hydrologic connectivity, and climate sensitivity of spatially distributed flow path networks on arctic hillslopes.

REFERENCES

  • Ali, G. A., C. L’Heureux, A. G. Roy, M. C. Turmel, and F. Courchesne, 2011, Linking spatial patterns of perched groundwater storage and stormflow generation processes in a headwater forested catchment: Hydrological Processes, 25, 3843–3857, doi: 10.1002/hyp.v25.2510.1002/hyp.v25.25.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Ananyan, A. A., 1958, Dependence of electrical conductivity of frozen rocks on moisture contents: Bulletin of the Academy of Science USSR, 12, 878–881.
    Google Scholar
  • Barker, R.D., 1979, Signal contributions sections and their use in resistivity studies: Geophysical Journal International, 59, 123–129, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1979.tb02555.x.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Binley, A., and A. Kemna, 2005, DC resistivity and induced polarization methods, in Y. RubinS. S. Hubbard, eds., Hydrogeophysics: Springer, 129–156.
    Google Scholar
  • Boise Center Aerospace Laboratory, 2014, BCAL LiDAR Tools, https://bcal.boisestate.edu/tools/ lidar, accessed 1 November 2014.
    Google Scholar
  • Bolève, A., A. Revil, F. Janod, J. L. Mattiuzzo, and J. J. Fry, 2009, Preferential fluid flow pathways in embankment dams imaged by self-potential tomography: Near Surface Geophysics, 7, 447–462, doi: 10.3997/1873-0604.2009012.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Bowden, W. B., B. J. Peterson, L. A. Deegan, A. D. Huryn, J. P. Benstead, H. Golden, M. Kendrick, S. M. Parker, E. Schuett, J. Vallino, and J. E. Hobbie, 2014, Ecology of streams of the Toolik region, in J. E. HobbieB. J. PetersonG. W. Kling, eds., Alaska’s changing Arctic: Ecological consequences for tundra, streams, and lakes. Part of the Long-term Ecological Research Network research synthesis series: Oxford University Press, 173–237.
    Google Scholar
  • Doussan, C., L. Jouniaux, and J. L. Thony, 2002, Variations of self-potential and unsaturated water flow with time in sandy loam and clay loam soils: Journal of Hydrology, 267, 173–185, doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00148-8.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton, T. D., 1986, Late Cenozoic glaciation of the central brooks range, in T. D. HamiltonK. M. ReedR. M. Thorson, eds., Glaciation in Alaska: The geologic record: Alaska Geological Society, 9–50.
    Google Scholar
  • Harris, S.A., H.M. French, J.A. Heginbottom, G.H. Johnston, B. Ladanyi, D.C. Sego, and R.O. van Everdignen, 1988, Glossary of permafrost and related ground-ice terms: National Research Council of Canada.
    Google Scholar
  • Hauck, C., M. Böttcher, and H. Maurer, 2011, A new model for estimating subsurface ice content based on combined electrical and seismic data sets: The Cryosphere, 5, 453–468, doi: 10.5194/tc-5-453-2011.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Hauck, C, 2002, Frozen ground monitoring using DC resistivity tomography: Geophysical Research Letters, 29, 1–4, doi: 10.1029/2002GL014995.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Hauck, C., 2013, New concepts in geophysical surveying and data interpretation for permafrost terrain: Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 24, 131–137, doi: 10.1002/ppp.1774.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Hauck, C., and C. Kneisel, 2008, Applied geophysics in periglacial environments: Cambridge University Press.
    Google Scholar
  • Hayley, K., L. R. Bentley, M. Gharibi, and M. Nightingale, 2007, Low temperature dependence of electrical resistivity: Implications for near surface geophysical monitoring: Geophysical Research Letters, 34, L18402, doi: 10.1029/2007GL031124.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Hewlett, J. D., and A. R. Hibbert, 1967, Factors affecting the response of small watershed to precipitation in humid areas: Forest Hydrology, 275–290.
    Google Scholar
  • Hilbich, C., C. Hauck, M. Hoelzle, M. Scherler, L. Schudel, I. Völksch, D. Vonder Mühll, and R. Mäusbacher, 2008, Monitoring mountain permafrost evolution using electrical resistivity tomography: A 7-year study of seasonal, annual, and long-term variations at Schilthorn, Swiss Alps: Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, 1–12, doi: 10.1029/2007JF000799.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Hinzman, L. D., D. L. Kane, R. E. Gieck, and K. R. Everett, 1991, Hydrologic and thermal properties of the active layer in the Alaskan Arctic: Cold Regions Science and Technology, 19, 95–110, doi: 10.1016/0165-232X(91)90001-W.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Ikard, S. J., A. Revil, M. Schmutz, M. Karaoulis, A. Jardani, and M. Mooney, 2014, Characterization of focused seepage through an earthfill dam using geoelectrical methods: Groundwater, 52, 952–965, doi: 10.1111/gwat.2014.52.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • James, A. L., and N. T. Roulet, 2007, Investigating hydrologic connectivity and its association with threshold change in runoff response in a temperate forested watershed: Hydrological Processes, 21, 3391–3408, doi: 10.1002/hyp.6554.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Jardani, A., A. Revil, W. Barrash, A. Crespy, E. Rizzo, S. Straface, M. Cardiff, B. Malama, C. Miller, and T. Johnson, 2009, Reconstruction of the water table from self-potential data: A Bayesian approach: Groundwater, 47, 213–227, doi: 10.1111/gwat.2009.47.issue-2.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Jencso, K. G., and B. L. McGlynn, 2011, Hierarchical controls on runoff generation: Topographically driven hydrologic connectivity, geology, and vegetation: Water Resources Research, 47, W11527, doi: 10.1029/2011WR010666.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Kane, D. L., L. D. Hinzman, and J. P. Zarling, 1991, Thermal response of the active layer to climatic warming in a permafrost environment: Cold Regions Science and Technology, 19, 111–122, doi: 10.1016/0165-232X(91)90002-X.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Kneisel, C., C. Hauck, R. Fortier, and B. Moorman, 2008, Advances in geophysical methods for permafrost investigations: Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 19, 157–178, doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1530.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Krautblatter, M., S. Verleysdonk, A. Flores-Orozco, and A. Kemna, 2010, Temperature-calibrated imaging of seasonal changes in permafrost rock walls by quantitative electrical resistivity tomography (Zugspitze, German/Austrian Alps): Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 115, 1–15, doi: 10.1029/2008JF001209.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Lewkowicz, A., B. Etzelmüller, and S. L. Smith, 2011, Characteristics of discontinuous permafrost based on ground temperature measurements and electrical resistivity tomography, Southern Yukon, Canada: Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, 22, 320–342, doi: 10.1002/ppp.703.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Lohse, K. A., and W. E. Dietrich, 2005, Contrasting effects of soil development on hydrological properties and flow paths: Water Resources Research, 41, W12419, doi: 10.1029/2004WR003403.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • McClymont, A., M. Hayashi, L. Bentley, and B. Christensen, 2013, Geophysical imaging and thermal modeling of subsurface morphology and thaw evolution of discontinuous permafrost: Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 118, 1826–1837.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • McGlynn, B. L., and J. J. McDonnell, 2003, Role of discrete landscape units in controlling catchment dissolved organic carbon dynamics: Water Resources Research, 39, 1190, doi: 10.1029/2002WR001525.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Minsley, B. J., T. P. Wellman, M. A. Walvoord, and A. Revil, 2015, Sensitivity of airborne geophysical data to sublacustrine and near-surface permafrost thaw: The Cryosphere, 9, 781–794, doi: 10.5194/tc-9-781-2015.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Moore, J. R., A. Boleve, J. W. Sanders, and S. D. Glaser, 2011, Self-potential investigation of moraine dam seepage: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 74, 277–286, doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.06.014.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson, F. E., K. M. Hinkel, N. I. Shiklomanov, G. R. Mueller, L. L. Miller, and D. A. Walker, 1998, Active-layer thickness in north central Alaska: Systematic sampling, scale, and spatial autocorrelation: Journal of Geophysical Research, 103, 28963–28973, doi: 10.1029/98JD00534.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Nippgen, F., B. L. McGlynn, and R. E. Emanuel, 2015, The spatial and temporal evolution of contributing areas: Water Resources Research, 51, 4550–4573, doi: 10.1002/wrcr.v51.610.1002/wrcr.v51.6.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Oldenburg, D. W., and Y. Li, 1999, Estimating depth of investigation in DC resistivity and IP surveys: Geophysics, 64, 403–416, doi: 10.1190/1.1444545.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Overduin, P. P., S. Westermann, and K. Yoshikawa, 2012, Geoelectric observations of the degradation of nearshore submarine permafrost at Barrow (Alaskan Beaufort Sea): Journal of Geophysical Research, 117: 1–9, doi: 10.1029/2011JF002088.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Parsekian, A.D., K. Singha, B. Minsley, W.S. Holbrook, and L. Slater, 2015, Multiscale geophysical imaging of the critical zone: Reviews of Geophysics, 53, 1–26, doi: 10.1002/2014RG000465.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Pellerin, L., 2002, Applications of electrical and electromagnetic methods for environmental and geotechnical investigations: Surveys in Geophysics, 23, 101–132, doi: 10.1023/A:1015044200567.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Petiau, G., 2000, Second generation of lead-lead chloride electrodes for geophysical applications: Pure and Applied Geophysics, 157, 357–382, doi: 10.1007/s000240050004.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Revil, A., L. Cary, Q. Fan, A. Finizola, and F. Trolard, 2005, Self-potential signals associated with preferential ground water flow pathways in a buried paleo-channel: Geophysical Research Letters, 32, 1–4, doi: 10.1029/2004GL022124.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Revil, A., and P. Leroy, 2001, Hydroelectric coupling in a clayey material: Geophysical Research Letters, 28, 1643–1646, doi: 10.1029/2000GL012268.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Revil, A., and A. Jardani, 2013, The self-potential method: Theory and applications in environmental geosciences: Cambridge University Press.
    Google Scholar
  • Richards, K., A. Revil, A. Jardani, F. Henderson, M. Batzle, and A. Haas, 2010, Pattern of shallow ground water flow at Mount Princeton Hot Springs, Colorado, using geoelectrical methods: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 198, 217–232, doi: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2010.09.001.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Rizzo, E., B. Suski, A. Revil, S. Straface, and S. Troisi, 2004, Self-potential signals associated with pumping tests experiments: Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 109, 1–14, doi: 10.1029/2004JB003049.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson, D. A., A. Binley, N. Crook, F. D. Day-Lewis, T. P. A. Ferre, V. J. S. Grauch, R. Knight, M. Knoll, V. Lakshmi, R. Miller, J. Nyquist, L. Pellerin, K. Singha, and L. Slater, 2008, Advancing process-based watershed hydrological research using near-surface geophysics: A vision for, and review of, electrical and magnetic geophysical methods: Hydrological Processes, 22, 3604–3635 .
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Scott, W., P. Sellmann, and J. Hunter, 1990, Geophysics in the study of permafrost, in S. Ward, ed., Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics: SEG, 355–384.
    Google Scholar
  • Soueid Ahmed, A., A. Jardani, A. Revil, and J. P. Dupont, 2014, Hydraulic conductivity field characterization from the joint inversion of hydraulic heads and self-potential data: Water Resources Research, 50, 3502–3522, doi: 10.1002/2013WR014645.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Stieglitz, M., J. Shaman, J. P. McNamara, V. Engel, J. Shanley, and G. W. Kling, 2003, An approach to understanding hydrologic connectivity on the hillslope and the implications for nutrient transport: Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17, 1105, doi: 10.1029/2003GB002041.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Suski, B., A. Revil, K. Titov, P. Konosavsky, M. Voltz, C. Dagès, and O. Huttel, 2006, Monitoring of an infiltration experiment using the self-potential method: Water Resources Research, 42, W08418, doi: 10.1029/2005WR004840.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Tetzlaff, D., C Birkel, J. Dick, J Geris, and C. Soulsby, 2014, Storage dynamics in hydropedological units control hillslope connectivity, runoff generation, and the evolution of catchment transit time distributions: Water Resources Research, 50, 969–985, doi: 10.1002/2013WR014147.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Tromp-van Meerveld, H. J., and J. J. McDonnell, 2006, Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: Part 2: The fill and spill hypothesis: Water Resources Research, 42, 1–11, doi: 10.1029/2004WR003800.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Walker, M. D., D. A. Walker, J. M. Welker, A. M. Arft, T. Bardsley, P. D. Brooks, J. T. Fahnestock, M. H. Jones, M. Losleben, A. N. Parsons, T. R. Seastedt, and P. L. Turner, 1999, Long-term experimental manipulation of winter snow regime and summer temperature in arctic and alpine Tundra: Hydrological Processes, 13, 2315–2330, doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-108510.1002/(ISSN)1099-1085.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Woo, M., 2012, Permafrost hydrology: Springer.
    Google Scholar
  • Yoshikawa, K., W. R. Bolton, V. E. Romanovsky, M. Fukuda, and L. D. Hinzman, 2003, Impacts of wildfire on the permafrost in the boreal forests of Interior Alaska: Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, 1–14, doi: 10.1029/2001JD000438.
    Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar