This website uses cookies to improve your experience. If you continue without changing your settings, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can disable cookies at any time.

×

Flow characteristics and a permeability model in nanoporous media with solid-liquid interfacial effects

Authors:

Molecular dynamics simulations of water flow through nanotubes have demonstrated higher flow rates than the flow rates predicted using classical models and a significant change in flow patterns due to the thin film that forms on the solid wall of the tubes. We have developed a two-region analytical model that described the flow characteristics and permeability of fluid flow through nanoporous media and considered the solid-liquid interfacial effects. Our model considers the influence of various interfacial effects, including long-range van der Waals forces, double-layer repulsive forces, and short-range structure repulsive forces, and it establishes relationships between the permeability and the average pore diameter, porosity, surface diffusion, and contact angle by numerical calculations. Our results indicate that the permeability calculated using the present model (with interfacial effects) is more than 30 times the results that were calculated using the Kozeny-Carman equation (without interfacial effects). The thickness of the thin film significantly affects the flow characteristics. We have gained new insight and guidance regarding the development of nanoscale pore reservoirs, such as shale gas and shale oil.

References

  • Blake, T. D., 1990, Slip between a liquid and a solid: DM Tolstoi’s (1952) theory reconsidered: Colloids and Surfaces, 47, 135–145, doi: 10.1016/0166-6622(90)80068-F.COSUD30166-6622CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camara, C. G., J. V. Escobar, J. R. Hird, and S. J. Putterman, 2008, Correlation between nanosecond X-ray flashes and stick-slip friction in peeling tape: Nature, 455, 1089–1092, doi: 10.1038/nature07378.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Chernozatonskii, L. A., Z. J. Kosakovskaja, E. A. Fedorov, and V. I. Panov, 1995, New carbon tubelite-ordered film structure of multilayer nanotubes: Physics Letters A, 197, 40–46, doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(94)00885-S.PYLAAG0375-9601CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Derjaguin, B. V., and N. V. Churaev, 1974, Structural component of disjoining pressure: Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 49, 249–255, doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(74)90358-0.JCISA50021-9797CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Exerowa, D., T. Kolarov, and Khr. Khristov, 1987, Direct measurement of disjoining pressure in black foam films. I: Films from an ionic surfactant: Colloids and Surfaces, 22, 161–169, doi: 10.1016/0166-6622(87)80218-4.COSUD30166-6622CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frolov, A. I., K. Kirchner, T. Kirchner, and M. V. Fedorov, 2012, Molecular-scale insights into the mechanisms of ionic liquids interactions with carbon nanotubes: Faraday Discussions, 154, 235–247, doi: 10.1039/C1FD00080B.FDISE61359-6640CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Harkins, W. D., 1952, The physical chemistry of surface films: Reinhold.Google Scholar
  • Hai, H., and G. Guillaume, 2012, Grand canonical-like molecular dynamics simulations: Application to anisotropic mass diffusion in a nanoporous medium: The Journal of Chemical Physics, 136, 184702, doi: 10.1063/1.4712139.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • He, P., H. Li, and X. Hou, 2014, Excess-entropy scaling of dynamics for methane in various nanoporous materials: Chemical Physics Letters, 593, 83–88, doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.12.044.CHPLBC0009-2614CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Israelachvili, J. N., 1985, Intermolecular and surface forces: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  • Joseph, S., and N. R. Aluru, 2008, Why are carbon nanotubes fast transporters of water?: Nano Letters, 8, 452–458, doi: 10.1021/nl072385q.NALEFD1530-6984CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Kong, X., 1999, Advanced seepage mechanics: University of Science and Technology of China Press.Google Scholar
  • Majumder, M., N. Chopra, R. Andrews, and B. J. Hinds, 2005, Nanoscale hydrodynamics: Enhanced flow in carbon nanotubes: Nature, 438, 7064.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Marti, J., J. Sala, and E. Guardia, 2010, Molecular dynamics simulations of water confined in graphene nanochannels: From ambient to supercritical environments: Journal of Molecular Liquids, 153, 72–78, doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2009.09.015.JMLIDT0167-7322CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Mattia, D., and C. Francesco, 2012, Explaining high flow rate of water in carbon nanotubes via solid-liquid interfacial effects: Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 13, 125–130, doi: 10.1007/s10404-012-0949-z.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Mullins, O. C, 2008, The physics of reservoir fluids: Discovery through downhole fluid analysis: Schlumberger.Google Scholar
  • Parsani, M., M. H. Carpenter, and E. J. Nielsen, 2015, Entropy stable wall boundary conditions for the three-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes equations: Journal of Computational Physics, 292, 88–113, doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.03.026.JCTPAH0021-9991CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Pascal, T. A., W. A. Goddard, and Y. Jung, 2011, Entropy and the driving force for the filling of carbon nanotubes with water: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 11794–11798, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108073108.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Qian, L., T. Yu, and S. Wen, 2013, Nanotechnology: Science Press.Google Scholar
  • Ruckenstein, E., and P. Rajora, 1983, On the no-slip boundary condition of hydrodynamics: Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 96, 488–491, doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(83)90050-4.JCISA50021-9797CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Sokołowski, S, 1986, Second surface virial coefficient for nitrogen adsorbed on graphite: Physics Letters A, 117, 468–472, doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(86)90405-6.PYLAAG0375-9601CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Song, H., M. Yu, W. Zhu, P. Wu, Y. Lou, Y. Wang, and J. Killough, 2015, Numerical investigation of gas flow rate in shale gas reservoirs with nanoporous media: International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 80, 626–635, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.09.039.IJHMAK0017-9310CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Song, H. Q., M. X. Yu, W. Y. Zhu, Y. Zhang, and S. X. Jiang, 2013, Dynamic characteristics of gas transport in nanoporous media: Chinese Physics Letters, 30, 14701–14703, doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/30/1/014701.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Tang, H. J., and K. H. Cui, 2007, Reservoir physics: Petroleum Industry.Google Scholar
  • Thomas, J. A., and A. J. H. McGaughey, 2008, Reassessing fast water transport through carbon nanotubes: Nano Letters, 8, 2788–2793, doi: 10.1021/nl8013617.NALEFD1530-6984CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas, J. A., and A. J. H. McGaughey, 2009, Water flow in carbon nanotubes: Transition to subcontinuum transport: Physical Review Letters, 102, 184502, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.184502.PRLTAO0031-9007CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Wang, X. A, and X. B. Peng, 2007, Dynamics of spreading of liquid on solid surface: Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 15, 730–737, doi: 10.1016/S1004-9541(07)60154-2.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
  • Wong, C. H., and V. Vijayaraghavan, 2014, Compressive characteristics of single walled carbon nanotube with water interactions investigated by using molecular dynamics simulation: Physics Letters A, 378, 570–576, doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2013.12.026.PYLAAG0375-9601CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar